Sora 2 vs Veo 3.1 vs Kling 3.0: Which AI Video Model Should You Use?
A side-by-side comparison of Sora 2, Veo 3.1, and Kling 3.0 on Klipvo, covering resolution, duration, inputs, audio, speed, and ideal use cases.
Three Models, Three Strengths
Sora 2, Veo 3.1, and Kling 3.0 are all available on Klipvo, but they are not interchangeable. Each model has different limits for duration, resolution, audio, and input type.
Specification Comparison
| Spec | Sora 2 | Veo 3.1 | Kling 3.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor | OpenAI | Google DeepMind | Kuaishou |
| Inputs on Klipvo | Text, image | Text, image | Text, image |
| Max Resolution | 720p | 1080p | 1080p |
| Duration Options | 4s, 8s, 12s | 4s, 6s, 8s | 3s to 15s |
| Native Audio | No | Yes | Yes |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16 | 16:9, 9:16 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 |
| Typical Speed | ~2 min | ~1 min | ~3 min |
When to Use Each
Sora 2
Sora 2 is a strong starting point for cinematic, photoreal scenes. It is best when you want a polished short clip and do not need native audio.
Veo 3.1
Veo 3.1 is the best fit when realistic motion and native audio matter. On Klipvo it supports both text-to-video and image-to-video with 4, 6, or 8 second durations.
Kling 3.0
Kling 3.0 is useful when you need a flexible duration range or a square 1:1 output. It supports both text and image inputs, and native audio is available for compatible settings.
Cost Considerations
The exact credits cost is shown before you generate. Duration, resolution, and audio can change the final cost, especially for models where the upstream provider charges per second.
Verdict
Use Sora 2 for cinematic output, Veo 3.1 for realistic motion with audio, and Kling 3.0 for flexible duration and square-format clips. Klipvo lets you switch between them in the same workspace.